世界遗产中心点名批评火车站站改工程

京城长安

问问世界遗产那帮人，西安城住不住现代人？

来自安卓APP客户端

冰中烈焰

luocheng 发表于 2021-06-26 23:02
本帖最后由 luocheng 于 2021-6-26 23:17 编辑

大明宫有遗产吗？充其量就是遗址吧。有时候觉得很搞笑，十年前这地方还是棚户区，现在却要供奉起来。公园就公园呗，诚实一点多好啊，市民能直管感受到它，你说它有历史就有历史呗，市民也不反对。但你真把历史当一回事，扯得太多了，就会没人愿意听了。试想，五千年的历史，哪个城市脚下没点历史？如果都要圈起来，岂不是满城都是遗址？

这可是唐大明宫啊。。。。。。怎么被你说的这么一文不值了。。。。。。旗帜鲜明反对历史虚无主义！！！！！！

来自苹果APP客户端

litanjun16

说实话世遗还不如复建一个含元殿来的直接，世界遗产有啥用

来自安卓APP客户端

大唐尚图寺

现在世界谁怕谁？怕你就输了

来自安卓APP客户端

lulu84825

关键是火车站又没盖到大明宫里面，而且为了不遮挡大明宫遗址的东南角把立交方案都撤了，一点也没见到世界遗产中心的表扬。

来自安卓APP客户端

云汉梵拓

shulinbao 发表于 2021-06-26 23:32
It is also regrettable that the State Party of China did not submit the proposal for re-developing and enlarging the Xi’an Railway Station at an earlier stage, to avert or mitigate adverse impacts on the setting of the Daming Palace component, as detailed in the ICOMOS Technical Review. Had the HIA been prepared earlier and been submitted to the World Heritage Centre with proposed designs, this project might have been amended to avoid its adverse impacts on the setting of the Daming Palace site. However, at this late stage, when construction work is already underway and the project is due for completion in July 2021, it is not feasible to recommend changes that might mitigate the adverse impacts in any meaningful way. It is recommended that the Committee remind the States Parties of the provisions of Paragraphs 118bis and 172 of the Operational Guidelines regarding any major restoration or new construction which may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and that such plans, including assessment of potential impacts on the property’s OUV, should be submitted as soon as possible and before making any decision that would be difficult to reverse. In the case of this serial transnational property, it is recommended that coordination should also be sought through the ICC.

幸好这次西安这次跟世界遗产中心提交的晚了，不然看世界遗产中心的意思，这个火车站的建筑方案非得修改不成。

这段里面没说到底咋负面影响了。是外观风貌嘛还是咋了。

来自苹果APP客户端

洋小兔儿

13453968916 发表于 2021-06-26 23:39
这话说的有意思，不想遵守人家群的规则，咱可以不进人家的群，也没人强迫加入吧？总不能既想进群，又不想遵守规则吧。这话没错吧？

为什的不行呢？选择有利于自己的执行，不利于自己的舍弃忽略。西方大国不都是这样的么？

来自安卓APP客户端

骚的呢兄弟

和那种国际环保组织一样，环别人的保，牵扯到自己的利益就闭嘴了。

来自安卓APP客户端